As the Focal Department of Examination (CBI) looks for the exchange of preliminary for a situation against Kashmiri dissenter pioneer and JKLF boss Yasin Malik regarding two cases, including the homicide of 4 Indian Aviation based armed forces (IAF) staff in 1989, the High Court on Wednesday requested that six co-blamed answer the organization's supplication.

Requesting that the co-charged record their answers in two weeks, a Seat drove by Equity Abhay S Oka posted the matter for additional meeting on January 20, 2025.

The bearing came after the Seat was informed that one of the 10 denounced has passed on while others have not recorded their answers. "All the charged must be heard assuming the preliminary is to be moved," Equity Oka said.

The CBI has tested a Jammu court's structure for the actual creation of Malik to confront preliminary for the situation. As of now held up in Tihar Prison in Delhi, Malik demanded being truly present in Jammu to question observers.

The Jammu Unique Court has looked for Malik's appearance for questioning of observers in two cases - the killing of four IAF faculty and kidnapping of Rubaiya Sayeed, girl of late Mufti Muhammad Sayeed - - a previous Boss Priest of past territory of Jammu and Kashmir — in 1989.

The top court had given notice on the CBI's request in April 2023 and remained the Jammu court's structure.

Noticing that even 26/11 Mumbai dread assault case charged Ajmal Kasab was given fair preliminary in India, the Seat had on November 21 proposed setting up a court in prison to question Malik.

Depicting him as "simply not another psychological militant", Specialist General Tushar Mehta had last month said, "We would rather not take him to Jammu and Kashmir as a result of the offense in which he has been sentenced… The Public authority can't go by the book in such cases."

Malik was truly present in the High Court during a consultation July 2023 subsequent to implying prison specialists that he needed to go to the meeting genuinely. Mehta had then composed an emphatic letter to the Home Secretary featuring that Malik's presence in the High Court was a grave security slip by.